by
astronut
@ Tuesday, May. 02, 2006 - 03:30:08 pm
I'm not really into football but I started watching a program last night about his life story. I nearly switched it off, the words 'has been' flashing into my mind, but i decided to carry on watching, realising that this judgement is a second hand one I read in a newspaper or heard someone say. I decided to make my own judgement. I realised that he was actually a really nice guy who let himself be swept along in the wrong direction by temptations. After all, what does a young lad without wisdom of the world do with a load of money and adulation. Money and adulation can cause even the mightiest to fall. Yes, it is 30 years since he was at the peak of his career but there is a good reason why he has since kept cropping up in the media, and why his funeral got so much attention. he was simply a genius in his own field (pun intended); he left a permanent mark on the landscape of human achievement, and it is natural that such a person will keep cropping up, whatever the reason, the same way that the Beatles (as a group) or Jimi Hendrix enjoy continued discussion in musical circles, even though they are long gone. The fact is people just loved reading or talking about him, if he was being good or bad.
'If only George Best had not wasted himself, he could have been so much better than he actually was' I often hear people saying. It is perhaps erroneous to think like this, because it may have been inevetible that his life went the way it did. The aspects of his personality which made him such a unique footballer, such as carisma, flair, talent and unpredictability, were probably the same aspects that made him likely to go off the rails;
If i see a DVD of the best George Best moments on the pitch, I'm sure one exists, then I would be very tempted to buy it. Concentrate on the good, and don't worry too much about the bad I say.
David