by
astronut
@ Monday, Nov. 05, 2007 - 09:49:38 am
Barry George is having a second attempt today to clear his name over his conviction of killing Jill Dando.
In the original trial, the sole evidence linking him directly to the murder was one tiny speck of gunshot residue, only visible through a powerful microscope, found in a pocket of a jacket he said he was wearing on the day.Other evidence was presented: an eyewitness who placed him on Dando's street at the time, although this witness said he had longish hair; his hairdresser was adamant that George never had long hair, but this did not come out in court.
In his appeal today he will argue that the particle of gunshot residue could have got into his jacket subsequently; for example, the jacket was taken to a police station where firearms had been tested and was put on a mannequin for photographs to be taken. He says there is more than a slim possibility that the residue could have arisen from contamination after the event.
What do people think to all this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7078221.stm